Glucose measurements met minimum analytical performance targets (Urel 3.68-4.36% vs limit 5.1%), whereas HbA1c measurements exceeded limits (Urel 4.56-4.59% vs limit 2.8%).
Glucose measurements met minimum analytical performance specification targets, whereas HbA1c measurements exceeded these limits, indicating higher measurement uncertainty that could impact patient classification.
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to calculate the measurement uncertainty (MU) of HbA 1c and glucose according to ISO/TS 20914:2019 guideline and to evaluate using indirect outcome-based analytical performance specifications (APS). Methods MU was estimated using internal quality control data collected between October 2023 and August 2025. A total of 13,270 and 13,824 IQC results for HbA 1c and 1,329 and 1,208 results for glucose were analyzed for Level 1 and Level 2 controls, respectively. HbA 1c was measured by capillary electrophoresis using two analyzers (12 capillaries each), and glucose was measured using the hexokinase method on three platforms. Maximum allowable uncertainty (MAU) targets were determined using the APS Simulator based on 2,000 patient samples with simultaneous HbA 1c and fasting plasma glucose results. Clinical decision limits were defined as 5.7 % (39 mmol/mol) and 6.5 % (48 mmol/mol) for HbA 1c , and 5.6 and 7 mmol/L for glucose. Overall agreement was used as the primary performance metric. Results Relative expanded MU (Urel) ranged from 4.56 to 4.59 % for HbA 1c expressed in %, 6.36–7.87 % for HbA 1c expressed in mmol/mol, and 3.68–4.36 % for glucose. Glucose Urel values remained below the minimum MAU limit (5.1 %), whereas HbA 1c values exceeded the corresponding limits (2.8 and 4.7 % for % and mmol/mol). Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 83.9 to 96 % and 93.4 to 99 % for glucose, and 85.4 to 93.4 % and 89 to 97.6 % for HbA 1c . Conclusions Glucose measurements met the minimum APS targets derived from the simulation model, whereas HbA 1c measurements exceeded these limits, indicating higher MU and a potential impact on patient classification around clinical decision limits.
Yurt et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Diabetes / Glycemic control (n=2,000). Measurement uncertainty calculation (ISO/TS 20914:2019) vs. Outcome-based analytical performance specifications (APS) was evaluated on Overall agreement. Glucose measurements met minimum analytical performance targets (Urel 3.68-4.36% vs limit 5.1%), whereas HbA1c measurements exceeded limits (Urel 4.56-4.59% vs limit 2.8%).