Complete vessel reconstruction incorporating side branches demonstrated superior predictive performance for atherosclerotic disease progression compared with single-vessel reconstruction (C statistic: 0.725 vs 0.651).
Observational
Does 3-dimensional complete vessel reconstruction incorporating side branches improve the prediction of atherosclerotic disease progression compared to single-vessel reconstruction?
Incorporating side branches into 3D coronary artery reconstruction improves the accuracy of wall shear stress metrics in predicting atherosclerotic plaque progression compared to single-vessel models.
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: The incorporation of side branches in vessel geometry influences wall shear stress (WSS) distribution. However, complete vessel reconstruction is time-consuming, and there is no evidence that its WSS estimations better predict atherosclerotic disease progression compared with the output of the conventional single-vessel reconstruction (SVR). METHODS: Patients who had baseline and 1-year follow-up intravascular ultrasound imaging (n=40 vessels), and patients with neoatherosclerotic lesions (n=13 vessels) on optical coherence tomography were included. All the studied vessels had at least one side branch with a diameter >1 mm; 3-dimensional complete vessel reconstruction and SVR were performed, and the time-averaged WSS and multidirectional WSS were computed. The performance of both methods in predicting disease progression in intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography models was assessed. RESULTS: <0.001) and influenced the multidirectional WSS distribution. In native segments, complete vessel reconstruction-derived WSS metrics demonstrated superior predictive performance for disease progression-defined as lumen area reduction and plaque burden increase-compared with SVR, as evidenced by improved out-of-sample accuracy (leave-one-out information criterion: 429 versus 551), discrimination (C statistic: 0.725 versus 0.651), calibration (Brier score: 0.172 versus 0.226), and explained variance (27.8% versus 20.7%). Consistent findings were observed in stented segments, where complete vessel reconstruction-derived WSS metrics more accurately predicted neointimal proliferation than SVR-derived metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating side branches into vessel reconstruction influences WSS distribution and enables more accurate prediction of atherosclerotic disease progression in native and stented segments than SVR.
Ramasamy et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Atherosclerotic disease progression. Complete vessel reconstruction vs. Conventional single-vessel reconstruction (SVR) was evaluated on Disease progression (lumen area reduction and plaque burden increase) (p=<0.001). Complete vessel reconstruction incorporating side branches demonstrated superior predictive performance for atherosclerotic disease progression compared with single-vessel reconstruction (C statistic: 0.725 vs 0.651).