Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Credit risk evaluation is a key factor in financial intermediation, regulatory capital provision, and risk management in the portfolio. In this study, we compare the deep learning performance for probability-of-default (PD) estimation with a structured financial econometric model using loan-level data of an Indian non-banking financial agency between May and August 2025. Using the interpretation of PD as a conditional expectation, which is in line with reduced-form default-intensity models, we compare deep learning, logistic regression, and gradient boosting using a pure time-based out-of-sample design. Model assessment focuses on discrimination and calibration, where the area under the precision–recall curve (AUC-PR), Brier score, log-loss, and Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests are utilized. The findings show that deep learning achieves higher accuracy in terms of calibration but a lower Brier score by about 18; this gap could be reduced by comparing logistic regression with statistically significant improvements in formal tests that compare forecasts. In portfolio back-testing, better probability scaling is translated into an actual loss reduction of about 12–13% for the August 2025 cohort. Although the improvements compared with the advanced ensemble techniques are moderate, the results indicate that deep learning improves the estimation of conditional default probabilities because of the better nonlinear modeling and upper-tail risk perception. This study contributes to the literature via its incorporation of machine learning and credit risk assessment into a formalized risk management and econometric assessment system.
Kamal et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: