Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
While generative AI promises to democratize creativity, we lack empirical understanding of how creative professionals begin using these systems. Through a 10-week longitudinal study following one artist’s self-directed exploration, we ask three case-bounded questions: what interaction patterns emerged? What dynamics characterized sustainable co-creation for this artist? How might we evaluate successful integration in this case? Our findings from this case study reveal: (1) physical environments and material practices drove digital interaction; (2) specific temporal patterns emerged (short prompt bursts, consolidation periods, multi-day resurfacing cycles) and (3) productive discomfort and sustained tension marked successful sessions. These patterns suggest alternative design spaces worth exploring. We contribute: (1) four empirically-grounded design patterns (park-and-resurface, warm-up modes, affect-to-action bridges, comfort controls) that could be prototyped and tested; and (2) speculative provocations that challenge efficiency-first paradigms. This case study demonstrates that some users may benefit from approaches orthogonal to current design paradigms.
Bird et al. (Mon,) studied this question.