Deep-space asteroid exploration is of significant importance for both deep-space exploration and scientific research. However, the complex gravitational fields near asteroids pose challenges for traditional model-based orbit control strategies. While artificial intelligence can estimate asteroid dynamics using sampled data, ensuring stability for real-time applications remains difficult. Most current methods rely on offline training, lack real-time autonomous adjustment, and require large volumes of training data. To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes, for the first time, a multi-scale adaptive orbit control framework that combines conventional control methods with artificial intelligence, using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to achieve high-precision trajectory tracking around rotating asteroids. Different from existing methods that rely on offline-trained networks or only approximate residual dynamics, the proposed approach employs physics-constrained online PINNs to directly estimate the complete unknown orbital dynamics. By embedding prior orbital dynamic laws into network training, the method is inherently explainable and non-black-box, while eliminating the dependence on high-precision prior gravity field models. This framework combines offline physics-constrained pre-training, fast-timescale Lyapunov-based online adaptation, and slow-timescale periodic retraining using buffered measurement data, where a dual-timescale learning structure ensures both rapid closed-loop stabilization and long-term model refinement. By the Lyapunov direct method and LaSalle–Yoshizawa theorem, the uniform ultimate boundedness of all closed-loop signals and the asymptotic convergence of tracking errors are rigorously proven. The simulation results show that the novel approach, which achieves 99.3% lower tracking error than traditional feedback control and 37.1% improvement over standard DNN, is more accurate in trajectory tracking and more robust to model uncertainties and sensor noises than conventional methods.
Fan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: