Background: Iodinated contrast media are essential for oncologic imaging but raise specific safety concerns because cancer patients are often exposed to repeated contrast-enhanced computed tomography, nephrotoxic drugs, immune-modulating therapies, and, in selected cases, radioiodine-dependent diagnostic or therapeutic pathways. Methods: We performed a narrative review based on an exploratory search followed by a focused search targeting iodinated contrast use in oncology-related settings. Studies were included if they addressed renal risk and post-contrast acute kidney injury, hypersensitivity and acute adverse reactions, or thyroid dysfunction with radioiodine-related implications. We also considered clinically relevant studies on drug interactions, isotope studies, and laboratory confounding. Results: The evidence base was methodologically heterogeneous, with renal safety as the predominant domain. Kidney injury after contrast-enhanced imaging in cancer patients appeared frequently multifactorial, supporting the broader concept of post-contrast acute kidney injury rather than automatic attribution to contrast alone. Hypersensitivity reactions to modern nonionic iodinated contrast media were generally uncommon, with severe reactions rare, although immune-modulating therapies may alter risk. Thyroid-related effects were usually transient but relevant in patients with thyroid autonomy and in differentiated thyroid carcinoma, where contrast exposure may affect scintigraphy and radioiodine planning. Conclusions: In oncology, iodinated contrast use requires individualized, field-specific risk stratification instead of reflexive avoidance.
Vasii et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: