Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Rationale 95% CI, 17.5-22.0% and 22.2%; 95% CI, 19.8-24.5%, respectively). Limitations: Lack of external validation. Conclusions: A PAD risk prediction model that combines clinical variables with ABI improves the identification of patients with CKD at high risk for PAD better than ABI alone.
Chen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.