Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Statins exhibit anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties, and although prior meta-analyses have suggested a possible reduction in CRC risk among patients with IBD, the evidence remains limited by small study numbers and methodological constraints. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing CRC incidence between statin users and non-users in IBD populations. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies on May 22, 2025. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore potential effect modifiers. Results Nine datasets from seven studies involving 639,595 IBD patients were included. Statin use was associated with a significantly reduced CRC risk (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69–0.87; I² = 27%). The association remained robust in sensitivity analyses and was stronger in high-quality studies (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54–0.78; I² = 0%). Meta-regression identified follow-up duration as a significant modifier (p = 0.03), and subgroup analysis confirmed that studies with 5 years of follow-up reported a greater risk reduction (p for subgroup difference = 0.02). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger’s test p = 0.35). Conclusions Statin use is associated with a lower risk of CRC in patients with IBD, particularly in studies with longer follow-up. These findings support further research on the chemopreventive potential of statins in this high-risk population. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD420251038799.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Meng Ding
Yang Liu
Ying Zhang
Frontiers in Immunology
Union Hospital
Union Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ding et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0bf5b3e8a76b3043884bfb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1693342