As a complex structural form capable of simultaneously bearing upper-deck highway traffic, lower-deck highway traffic, and rail transit, the curved chord stiffened double-deck continuous steel truss bridge is distinct from traditional single-deck bridges. The spatial superposition of multiple traffic types within this structure may result in multiple components approaching their critical states concurrently. Despite prior research efforts on this structural type, the failure evolution process from local yielding to global collapse under mixed traffic loads remains ambiguous. This study addresses these questions through systematic numerical investigation of a nine-span bridge with a 300 m main span. A two-stage analytical approach is employed: a Midas/Civil analysis first identifies critically stressed regions, then ABAQUS multi-scale modeling enables refined analysis of critical components while maintaining computational efficiency. Twenty-nine combined traffic loading cases encompassing dual- and triple-category configurations are systematically analyzed. The results show that the ultimate load-carrying capacity coefficients range from approximately 7 to 18, with a minimum of 7.137, and the dual-level highway combinations exert greater influence than road–rail combinations. More importantly, three failure path convergence characteristics were discovered. First, the initial failure position under each working condition tends to be consistent, initiating at the lower chord near the top of the mid-span pier, which confirms that inherent structural defects exist at this location. Second, the gusset plate at the top of pier W6 appears as the second failure location in 48% of cases and ranks within the first four locations across all cases. Third, path similarity progressively increases with traffic diversity. Additionally, Q370qE steel exhibits 5–22% stress exceedance with variable critical locations depending on traffic conditions. Based on these convergence characteristics, a safety monitoring scheme is proposed: monitoring points need to be arranged symmetrically on both sides of the bridge on the top chords, bottom chords, web members, and wedge plates near the tops of the piers.
Wang et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: