Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objectives: Emergency Department (ED) boarding affects patient flow and clinical decision making, but its impact on ED observation unit (EDOU) utilization remains unclear. In this study, we examine whether ED boarding census levels are associated with changes in the characteristics, care processes, and outcomes of patients placed in the EDOU. Methods: and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Among 8,469 encounters, patient characteristics remained largely consistent across boarding quartiles. Most diagnostic testing and imaging did not vary significantly. Higher boarding levels were associated with longer ED-to-EDOU times and modest increases in specialty consultations, ultrasounds, and echocardiograms. Admission rates were slightly higher in the highest boarding quartile compared with the lowest. EDOU length of stay increased incrementally with higher boarding levels. Conclusions: ED boarding levels were not strongly associated with changes in EDOU patient characteristics, management, or outcomes. Structured eligibility criteria and dedicated review processes likely insulated EDOU use from short-term operational pressures. Modest increases in consultations, diagnostics, and admissions suggest that slightly more complex patients may be placed in the EDOU during periods of high boarding. Overall, EDOU function remained relatively stable, supporting its role as a consistent throughput mechanism even during ED crowding.
Samadian et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: