A PhenoAgeAccel index ≥ -0.338 was associated with a significantly higher risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation compared to an index < -0.338 (OR 3.989).
Cohort (n=322)
No
Does a higher accelerated phenotypic age (PhenoAgeAccel) increase the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation?
Accelerated phenotypic age is an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation and improves the predictive value of existing risk models such as the APPLE score.
Effect estimate: OR 3.989 (95% CI 2.006-7.933)
Absolute Event Rate: 70.3% vs 31.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Purpose: To investigate the relationship between phenotypic age (PhenoAge) and accelerated phenotypic age (PhenoAgeAccel) and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Patients and Methods: Preoperative PhenoAge and PhenoAgeAccel were determined in AF patients undergoing RFCA. We used logistic regression models and subgroup analysis to study the relationship between PhenoAge and PhenoAgeAccel and the risk of AF recurrence. As for revealing the value of PhenoAgeAccel in predicting AF recurrence, the ROC curve analysis was performed. To further detect the enhancement role of in PhenoAgeAccel in the APPLE score and a model of established risk factors in predicting AF recurrence, C‐statistics, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was conducted. Results: A total of 322 patients with AF who underwent RFCA in our hospital were included in the present study. The mean follow-up period was 21 months. The frequency of AF recurrence increased gradually as the PhenoAgeAccel index rose. The optimal cut-off value of the PhenoAgeAccel index was − 0.338. Patients with PhenoAgeAccel ≥ -0.338 had a significantly greater likelihood of experiencing recurrent AF than those with PhenoAgeAccel <-0.338 (OR 3.989, 95% CI 2.006– 7.933, p < 0.001). The association was also reflected in each subgroup. Incorporating the PhenoAgeAccel into the APPLE score and the existing model of established risk factors for recurrence may result in enhancements to the C-statistics, NRI and IDI ( p < 0.05), respectively. Conclusion: PhenoAgeAccel was positively and independently associated with AF recurrence following RFCA. Keywords: atrial fibrillation, radiofrequency catheter ablation, recurrence, phenotypic age, accelerated phenotypic age
Zhao et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=322). PhenoAgeAccel ≥ -0.338 vs. PhenoAgeAccel < -0.338 was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence (OR 3.989, 95% CI 2.006-7.933, p=<0.001). A PhenoAgeAccel index ≥ -0.338 was associated with a significantly higher risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation compared to an index < -0.338 (OR 3.989).