Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Split liver transplantation (SLT) can expand the donor pool by generating 2 grafts from 1 organ. However, SLT only consists of <5% of United States liver transplants. Factors determining adequate SLT prognosis remain understudied. METHODS: A retrospective study of adult deceased-donor liver transplant recipients (January 2015 to September 2025) was conducted using the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. The primary outcome was graft survival (GS) at 3 and 12 months. SLT recipients were analyzed by graft laterality, splitting technique, graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), and graft weight-to-standard liver volume (GW/SLV) ratio. Propensity score matching (PSM; 1:1) was used to compare SLT with whole liver transplantation (WLT), followed by sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Among 840 SLT recipients, right lobe graft (RLG) demonstrated superior 12-month GS over left lobe graft (LLG) (91.7% vs 79.6%, respectively; P <.001), GRWR ≥ 0.8 outperformed GRWR < 0.8 (91.4% vs 85.3%, respectively; P =.045), and GW/SLV ≥ 0.45 outperformed GW/SLV < 0.45 (91.3% vs 83.0%, respectively; P =.032). Using propensity score-matched analysis, SLT demonstrated lower GS than WLT at 3 months (93.7% vs 96.6%, respectively; hazard ratio HR, 1.89; P =.03) and 12 months (89.8% vs 93.4%, respectively; HR, 1.60; P =.03). Sensitivity analyses revealed that this difference was driven by LLG (3-month HR, 6.62; 12-month HR, 4.03; both P <.001), GRWR < 0.8 (3-month HR, 4.39; P =.008; 12-month HR, 2.98; P =.02), and recipients aged ≥55 years (3-month HR, 2.05; P =.047; 12-month HR, 1.86; P =.03). RLG, GRWR ≥ 0.8, GW/SLV ≥ 0.45, and recipients aged <55 years demonstrated outcomes comparable with those of WLT. CONCLUSION: Within the SLT cohort, RLG, GRWR ≥ 0.8, and GW/SLV ≥ 0.45 were associated with superior early GS. Compared with the detrimental GS difference of WLT, the detrimental GS difference of SLT was attenuated with RLG, younger recipients, and adequately matched grafts.
Sierra et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: