Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Comparative cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) effectiveness data to date are limited to real-world progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Additional effectiveness measures such as time from initial treatment to progression on first subsequent therapy (rwPFS2) and real-world tumor response (rwTR) provide full understanding of CDK4/6i real-world effectiveness. This analysis compared rwPFS2 and rwTR in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving first-line (1L) CDK4/6i plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) in US routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: P-VERIFY was a retrospective Flatiron Health Research Database analysis of adult patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who started 1L CDK4/6i (palbociclib; ribociclib; abemaciclib) plus AI between February 2015 and November 2023 (N = 9146). rwPFS2 analysis included all 9146 patients while rwTR analysis included 8010 (87.6%) patients who had ≥1 tumor response assessment. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance patient baseline characteristics. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: After sIPTW, no significant differences were observed across all pairwise treatment comparisons between the CDK4/6i for rwPFS2 and rwTR (all p > 0.05). Findings were generally consistent across subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Findings were also consistent in a separate analysis of patients treated from 2017 onward, corresponding with commercial availability of all three CDK4/6i in the US. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study demonstrated no statistically significant differences in rwPFS2 and rwTR in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving 1L palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, in combination with an AI, in routine clinical practice in the US. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT06495164.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hope S. Rugo
City of Hope
Adam Brufsky
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
Rachel M. Layman
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
The Breast
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Université Paris Cité
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rugo et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11d1c837ecc83ca3fd4bfb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104780