Factor models measure what private fund investors do not need to optimize: NAV volatility and factor exposures. They do not measure what investors must control: capital risk (permanent loss over a fund’s lifetime) and funding liquidity risk (capital calls relative to liquid reserves). These two risk types are orthogonal to factor exposures and require cash flow models. In this article, we argue that factor models retain value for liquid-sleeve management, direct investments, and performance attribution, but cash flow models must drive commitment pacing, liquidity management, and allocation sizing. The division of labor between the two is the central contribution of this article.
Jeet et al. (Sat,) studied this question.