This working paper proposes a structural alternative to current Unified Field Theory approaches. Rather than attempting to merge quantum mechanics and General Relativity dynamically, the hypothesis maps both as emergent projections of a static, 4-dimensional spatial tensor lattice (T⁴). The central testable claim is geometric: particle identity and CP violations are not intrinsic properties of dynamic fields, but native orientations within a non-orientable bulk manifold. Matter and antimatter are the same topological path traversed in opposite directions. If the observed baryon asymmetry (η ≈ 6 × 10⁻¹⁰) emerges as an inescapable constant of T⁴'s curvature — without parameter tuning — the model offers a falsifiable alternative to standard baryogenesis. If it requires tuning, it fails. Spacetime is treated as a rendered 3D+time shadow, generated when a 4-dimensional operator Ĉ sequentially processes the static lattice. Time is the frame rate of that rendering, not a physical dimension of the bulk. This document is a boundary brief for differential geometers. The three open mathematical priorities are: defining the class of non-orientable 4-manifolds capable of functioning as T⁴; deriving the topological inversion rate to test against η; and constructing the projection tensor that yields the Einstein Field Equations from dimensional reduction. The consciousness operator is a necessary mechanical component but is explicitly treated as an open problem, separable from the geometric claims. A companion plain-language document — "Where the Map Runs Out: A Plain-Language Introduction to the Static Lattice Hypothesis" — approaches the same framework from a non-specialist perspective and is available as a separate Zenodo deposit and is available at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20358426 Version 0.7 — working draft.
James Stinton-duGard (Sat,) studied this question.