Enterprise systems are widely adopted in organizations, yet user acceptance remains a major challenge due to the complex interplay of cognitive, social, motivational, and innovation-related factors. Existing technology acceptance models often provide fragmented explanations by focusing on limited determinants. This study proposes TAM 4, an exploratory framework integrating constructs from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), Hedonic-Motivation System Adoption Model (HMSAM), and Diffusion of Innovation (DOI). The study was conducted in the context of enterprise application usage and professional enterprise system training environments involving organizational users, trainees, and practitioners. Data were collected from 115 enterprise system users (trainees and practitioners). To consolidate overlapping indicators and strengthen construct definition, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied, yielding seven higher-order constructs that explain 81.642% of cumulative variance. The framework was validated using PLS-SEM with three scenario-based structural models (full mediation, partial mediation, and direct effects). The results show that Model 3 provides the best fit and predictive performance (SRMR = 0.048; NFI = 0.786), indicating that enterprise system adoption is better explained through a direct effect structure rather than a purely mediated TAM pathway. The novelty of this study lies in introducing TAM 4 as a PCA-driven multi-theory acceptance model and evaluating its explanatory robustness through multi-scenario model comparison, offering practical insights for improving enterprise system implementation strategies.
Lubis et al. (Sat,) studied this question.