Breast cancer surgical management encompasses a spectrum of options that extend beyond oncologic control and carry substantially different cumulative surgical burdens. Although breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy offer equivalent survival outcomes in many clinical scenarios, the downstream implications of these choices, including the number of operations, complication profiles, recovery timelines, and need for revision, are often underrecognized during initial treatment planning. This review aims to provide non-plastic surgeons with a practical framework for understanding the surgical burden associated with BCT compared with mastectomy and, when mastectomy is selected, the implications of subsequent reconstructive pathways. By discussing breast cancer surgery through the lens of cumulative surgical burden rather than isolated procedural choices, this review seeks to support more informed, multidisciplinary counseling and shared decision-making. A clearer understanding of reconstructive trajectories may help align surgical recommendations with patient values, optimize expectations, and reduce unanticipated downstream interventions across the continuum of breast cancer care.
Wojtalik et al. (Sat,) studied this question.