Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Digital Product Passports (DPPs) are being introduced in the European Union to support circular economy strategies, improve product transparency, and enable lifecycle-based compliance and decision-making. Despite growing interest, research on DPPs remains fragmented, and there is limited consensus on how to design and validate DPP frameworks in real-world contexts. This paper presents a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed studies that explicitly define, structure, or assess DPP-related frameworks. Using a transparent search strategy based on Scopus and IEEE Xplore, combined with structured screening, the review assesses framework design elaboration and validation maturity across included studies and interprets recurring framework archetypes across application sectors. The results show that most studies emphasise conceptual or architectural designs. These commonly adopt data-centric, layered, technology-anchored, or ecosystem-oriented structures and frequently refer to enabling technologies such as digital twins, blockchain, data spaces, and knowledge graphs. However, explicit validation remains limited and is primarily restricted to illustrative case studies, stakeholder-informed assessments, or prototypes, with few studies evaluating scalability, interoperability, or lifecycle-spanning operation in real-world contexts. By consolidating design principles and validation practices across sectors in this targeted corpus, the review clarifies the current state of the art and highlights critical research gaps. The findings indicate that DPP research is characterised by a strong emphasis on framework design, with comparatively limited empirical validation. Furthermore, critical research gaps include the lack of rigorous empirical validation, cross-organisational testing, lifecycle-spanning evaluation, clearly defined data governance responsibilities, convergence towards shared reference architectures, and sector-specific adaptation.
Lyse et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: