Abstract Digital environments have become the primary medium through which human beings communicate, construct memory, and make decisions. The scale and speed at which information is now curated, shared, and consumed has no historical precedent, and yet courts, investigators, and policy bodies continue to operate without a standardized framework for evaluating how digital exposure influences human behavior, testimony, and identity. This gap has created vulnerabilities in justice systems, child protection, and democratic processes, where manipulated narratives, algorithmic bias, and synthetic media can distort perception and compromise integrity. Digital Behavior Integrity Psychology (DBIP) addresses this urgent need by introducing a lexicon‑driven framework of fifty‑seven measurable indicators, systematically organized across four domains: Digital Influence Load, Digital Memory Contamination, Identity Fragmentation, and Digital Risk and Resilience. Each lexicon functions as both a diagnostic marker and an evaluative tool, enabling professionals to quantify the degree of digital influence on human cognition and conduct. By transforming digital behavioral data into analyzable indicators, DBIP provides courts, law enforcement agencies, child protection institutions, and policy bodies with a scientific vocabulary for assessing credibility, reliability, and vulnerability. The discipline establishes a new gold standard for evaluating the integrity of human behavior in the digital age. It safeguards testimony by identifying contamination risks, reduces manipulation by exposing algorithmic and viral influence, and strengthens judicial fairness by embedding measurable psychological constructs into legal and investigative practice. DBIP also bridges psychology, law, and digital forensics, creating an interdisciplinary foundation that empowers researchers and practitioners to study digital influence with precision. In essence, DBIP is not merely an academic innovation but a transformative discipline that redefines how societies understand and protect human behavior under digital conditions. It equips institutions with the tools to resist misinformation, preserve memory integrity, and uphold ethical accountability, ensuring that justice and policy remain resilient in the face of unprecedented technological change.
SZ_Uncle-Sam (Wed,) studied this question.