This study investigated context-associated variation in vocalizations in Malinois dogs through acoustic parameter analysis. Vocalizations from thirty adult Malinois dogs (15 males, 15 females) aged 2 to 3 years were recorded across 11 behaviourally defined contexts. Using Praat software, key acoustic parameters—fundamental frequency (F0), harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR), and formant frequencies—were extracted and analyzed. Results indicated that different vocalization types (barking, whimpering, growling, snarling, howling) exhibited distinct acoustic profiles. Whimpering and howling showed significantly higher F0 values than barking (p < 0.05), with whimpering uniquely displaying both low and high F0 components. Dogs in contexts expected to be positively valenced (e.g., food anticipation) showed lower HNR than those in contexts expected to be negatively valenced (e.g., separation) (p < 0.05). However, the actual internal states were not independently verified. Formant analysis revealed that snarling and howling had lower Formant 1 (F1) values (p < 0.05), while formant dispersion varied with emotional state. These findings suggest that acoustic analysis of dog vocalizations can provide objective insights into dogs’ motivational and arousal changes, thereby improving our understanding of canine vocal communication, social behavior, and the human–dog bond. This approach has potential applications for working-line Malinois breeding programs and for enhancing human–working dog interactions.
Li et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: