This study examines publication trends, leading contributors, and citation patterns on digital leadership and school performance through a quantitative bibliometric design using Scopus-indexed publications. Performance metrics and science mapping techniques were applied to systematically retrieved, cleaned, and standardized datasets. Findings revealed that research productivity in the field was limited during the 1990s but increased significantly in recent years, reflecting the growing relevance of digital transformation in education. The analysis showed that the field is dominated by selected journals, institutions, and countries, particularly the United States, which produced the highest number of publications and citations. Journal articles emerged as the most common publication type, while the social sciences remained the leading disciplinary area associated with the topic. Co-authorship analysis demonstrated tightly connected collaborative networks among scholars and institutions, highlighting the increasing importance of research partnerships in advancing knowledge production. Keyword and thematic analyses identified “technology leadership” as the central research theme, alongside related concepts such as innovation, e-leadership, digital transformation, and educational technology. These findings indicate the evolving and interdisciplinary nature of digital leadership research within educational contexts. In conclusion, the need for policies and institutional initiatives that strengthen international and interdisciplinary collaboration, in underrepresented regions. It highlights the importance of embedding digital leadership competencies into educational curricula by integrating ICT foundations with innovation, resilience, collaboration, adaptability, and strategic leadership practices. Such integration may better prepare future educational leaders to manage digitally mediated learning environments. Despite limitations, including reliance on a single database, exclusion of non-English publications, and limited qualitative interpretation, the study underscores the value of expanding scholarly participation and incorporating diverse disciplinary perspectives to support evidence-based educational digital transformation.
Melbert Hungo (Fri,) studied this question.