Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Reliable pavement condition assessment using UAV-derived orthophotos remains challenging under manual flight conditions, where acquisition parameters are not predefined and photogrammetric quality is highly operator-dependent. This study evaluates how UAV flight configuration influences orthophoto quality and operational usability for road infrastructure assessment in real-world manual survey scenarios. Eight flight treatments combining altitude (30–40 m AGL), flight speed (low/normal), and image capture interval (2–3 s) were tested over an urban–peri-urban road segment in Misantla, Veracruz, Mexico, using a DJI Air 3S platform. Orthomosaic quality was assessed through ground sampling distance (GSD), tie-point density, multiplicity, RMS reprojection error, dense cloud size, orthomosaic continuity, and a criteria-based interpretability index supported by field observations. Results show that while altitude controls spatial resolution, resolution alone is insufficient for reliable pavement assessment. Configurations with higher image overlap and photogrammetric redundancy (notably Treatment 1 (T1) and Treatment 3 (T3)) achieved superior geometric consistency, reduced seam artifacts, and improved detection of subtle surface irregularities. In contrast, reduced-overlap configurations produced complete but less interpretable orthomosaics. The study provides experimentally validated operational guidelines for optimizing UAV flight parameters under manual conditions, bridging the gap between controlled photogrammetric theory and practical infrastructure monitoring.
López-González et al. (Mon,) studied this question.