Achieving deep decarbonization of the residential building sector is essential for meeting Canada’s climate commitments and Net Zero targets. However, large-scale residential retrofit planning is often constrained by the time, cost, and expertise required for detailed building energy modelling. This study evaluates the applicability of a typology-based retrofit planning tool developed by Homes to Zero (HTZ) as a simplified alternative to conventional simulation-based analysis. Two representative Canadian residential archetypes—a detached bungalow and a two-storey semi-detached home located in Toronto—were analyzed using both the HTZ platform and detailed hourly energy simulations conducted in eQuest (DOE-2.2 engine). Baseline energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were first compared across the two modelling approaches. Results show strong agreement for the bungalow case, with differences of less than 1% for electricity and natural gas consumption and approximately 4% for total emissions. For the two-storey dwelling, baseline electricity estimates were identical while natural gas consumption differed by approximately 17%, highlighting the sensitivity of physics-based simulations to envelope and operational assumptions. Retrofit scenarios were then compared using single-measure GHG reductions derived from HTZ and incremental simulation results from eQuest. While both tools identified electrification through air-source heat pumps as the dominant emission-reduction strategy, differences were observed in the magnitude of savings for envelope upgrades and secondary measures. The HTZ platform also provides approximate retrofit cost estimates, enabling order-of-magnitude budgeting, whereas eQuest requires separate costing analysis. This study is framed as a screening-level benchmark rather than a full validation exercise, highlighting the trade-off between scalability and modelling fidelity in residential retrofit planning. The results suggest that typology-based tools can provide credible screening-level guidance for residential retrofit planning and large-scale policy analysis, while detailed simulation remains valuable for evaluating integrated retrofit packages and design-level decisions.
Heidari et al. (Tue,) studied this question.