This preprint presents a geometric reconstruction of Schrödinger dynamics based on coherent transport in an axial–phase configuration space. Within this framework, physical evolution is represented as a spiral process combining irreversible axial progression with transverse phase rotation. The approach seeks to provide a minimal geometric interpretation of quantum dynamics while preserving the established empirical structure of quantum mechanics. By imposing phase closure, preservation of superposition structure, and invariance of overlap relations, the admissible evolution law is constrained to a linear first-order transport equation generated by a Hermitian operator. When intrinsic evolution is projected onto an observational frame in which laboratory time is effectively defined, the resulting transport law reduces to the conventional Schrödinger equation. The framework suggests that laboratory time need not coincide with the fundamental evolution parameter but may emerge as an effective coordinate through projection. This perspective is consistent with ongoing discussions in both quantum theory and cosmology regarding the possibility that conventional notions of time are incomplete while leaving the successful predictive structure of quantum mechanics unchanged. Potential deviations from the standard description are expected only in regimes where intrinsic axial support becomes experimentally accessible or where the effective time-local approximation breaks down. The work therefore provides a geometric interpretation of Schrödinger dynamics that reproduces standard quantum mechanics within its established domain of validity while identifying possible directions for future theoretical and experimental investigation. This manuscript was originally prepared for submission to a peer-reviewed journal and is archived here as a preprint. Keywords: quantum mechanics, Schrödinger equation, geometric interpretation, time, phase space, Hermitian operators, quantum foundations, wave mechanics, coherent transport, emergent time.
Stephan Hueffer (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: