Large language models based on the transformer architecture are now capable of producing human-like language. But do they encode and process linguistic meaning in a human-like way? Here, we address this question by analysing 7T fMRI data from 30 participants reading 108 sentences each. These sentences are carefully designed to disentangle sentence structure from word meaning, thereby testing whether transformers are able to represent aspects of sentence meaning above the word level. We found that while transformer models match brain representations better than models that completely ignore word order, all transformer models performed poorly overall. Further, transformers were significantly inferior to models explicitly designed to encode the structural relations between words. Our results provide insight into the nature of sentence representation in the brain, highlighting the critical role of sentence structure. They also cast doubt on the claim that transformers represent sentence meaning similarly to the human brain.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fodor et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0933e6551bb0af8ce44e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.19.665701
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
James Fodor
Carsten Murawski
Shinsuke Suzuki
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...