Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Despite numerous studies on second-line therapies in metastatic pancreatic cancer, there is no randomized study evaluating the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as a second-line treatment. This study aims to examine the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in second-line therapy. In this retrospective study, a total of 218 patients from 23 centers were included and the median age of 60.2 years. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), treatment efficacy based on ECOG performance status (PS), and tumor marker (CEA, CA 19 − 9) levels. In the second-line treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, the median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 7.1), and the median OS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 10.0). Median PFS was 6.6 months in patients with normal CEA levels compared to 4.4 months in patients with high CEA levels (P = 0.01). Median PFS was 6 months in patients with ECOG PS 0–1 compared to 3.8 months in patients with PS 2 (P < 0.01). This study demonstrates the contribution of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in both OS and PFS in second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. We believe it is a good option, especially for younger patients with good ECOG PS.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sezgin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e58edfb6db64358752ab5d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4800776/v1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Yasin Sezgin
Oğur Karhan
Mehmet Naci Aldemir
Bilkent University
Gazi University
Koç University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...