Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The Bayes factor is a ratio of two posterior normalizing constants, which may be difficult to compute. We compare several methods of estimating Bayes factors when it is possible to simulate observations from the posterior distributions, via Markov chain Monte Carlo or other techniques. The methods that we study are all easily applied without consideration of special features of the problem, provided that each posterior distribution is well behaved in the sense of having a single dominant mode. We consider a simulated version of Laplace's method, a simulated version of Bartlett correction, importance sampling, and a reciprocal importance sampling technique. We also introduce local volume corrections for each of these. In addition, we apply the bridge sampling method of Meng and Wong. We find that a simulated version of Laplace's method, with local volume correction, furnishes an accurate approximation that is especially useful when likelihood function evaluations are costly. A simple bridge sampling technique in conjunction with Laplace's method often achieves an order of magnitude improvement in accuracy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas J. DiCiccio
Robert E. Kass
Adrian E. Raftery
Journal of the American Statistical Association
University of Washington
Cornell University
Carnegie Mellon University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
DiCiccio et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/697b2498695ccef27eb71313 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1997.10474045
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: