Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Ninety-seven percent of drug-indication pairs that are tested in clinical trials in oncology never advance to receive U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. While lack of efficacy and dose-limiting toxicities are the most common causes of trial failure, the reason(s) why so many new drugs encounter these problems is not well understood. Using CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis, we investigated a set of cancer drugs and drug targets in various stages of clinical testing. We show that-contrary to previous reports obtained predominantly with RNA interference and small-molecule inhibitors-the proteins ostensibly targeted by these drugs are nonessential for cancer cell proliferation. Moreover, the efficacy of each drug that we tested was unaffected by the loss of its putative target, indicating that these compounds kill cells via off-target effects. By applying a genetic target-deconvolution strategy, we found that the mischaracterized anticancer agent OTS964 is actually a potent inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK11 and that multiple cancer types are addicted to CDK11 expression. We suggest that stringent genetic validation of the mechanism of action of cancer drugs in the preclinical setting may decrease the number of therapies tested in human patients that fail to provide any clinical benefit.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lin et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d75654b54ccf0cfef30e49 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw8412
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Ann Lin
Christopher J. Giuliano
Ann Palladino
Science Translational Medicine
Stony Brook University
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Hofstra University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...