Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The first purpose of this review was to assess the impact of implementation on program outcomes, and the second purpose was to identify factors affecting the implementation process. Results from over quantitative 500 studies offered strong empirical support to the conclusion that the level of implementation affects the outcomes obtained in promotion and prevention programs. Findings from 81 additional reports indicate there are at least 23 contextual factors that influence implementation. The implementation process is affected by variables related to communities, providers and innovations, and aspects of the prevention delivery system (i.e., organizational functioning) and the prevention support system (i.e., training and technical assistance). The collection of implementation data is an essential feature of program evaluations, and more information is needed on which and how various factors influence implementation in different community settings.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Durlak et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d80b493eff0c9dfaae321e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Joseph A. Durlak
Emily P. DuPre
American Journal of Community Psychology
Loyola University Chicago
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...