Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Observational studies aiming to estimate causal effects often rely on conceptual frameworks that are unfamiliar to many researchers and practitioners. We provide a clear, structured overview of key concepts and terms, intended as a starting point for readers unfamiliar with the causal inference literature. First, we introduce theoretical frameworks underlying causal effect estimation methods: the counterfactual theory of causation, the potential outcomes framework, structural equations and directed acyclic graphs. Second, we define the most common causal effect estimands, and the issues of effect measure modification, interaction and mediation (direct and indirect effects). Third, we define the assumptions required to estimate causal effects: exchangeability, positivity, consistency and non-interference. Fourth, we define and explain biases that arise when attempting to estimate causal effects, including confounding, collider bias, selection bias and measurement bias. Finally, we describe common methods and study designs for causal effect estimation, including covariate adjustment, G-methods and natural experiment methods.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Erik Igelström
Peter Craig
Jim Lewsey
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
University of Glasgow
The University of Adelaide
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Igelström et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df05b23b0ba53fb37a0d2e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219267
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: