Objective: To develop and preliminarily validate a dyadic psychoeducational intervention program for maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients and their caregivers based on the Double ABC-X Model. Methods: The intervention was constructed by integrating evidence from systematic reviews, cross-sectional survey data (200 MHD patient-caregiver dyads), and a two-round Delphi expert consultation (20 experts). The program, grounded in the Double ABC-X Model, comprised four core modules: (1) disease information provision, (2) social support enhancement, (3) coping strategy training, and (4) relaxation techniques. A pilot trial with three dyads was conducted to assess feasibility and refine the program. Effectiveness was not evaluated in this developmental study. Results: The intervention was designed as a 4-week program with one 30– 40 minute session per week, delivered in face-to-face small groups during pre- or post-dialysis periods. It comprises 4 first-level, 22 second-level, and 10 third-level indicators, organized into four themes: “First Acquaintance”, “Deep Understanding”, “Co - Solution” and “Co - Experience”. Delphi results showed high expert authority (Cr=0.85– 0.86), significant Kendall’s concordance coefficient (P< 0.001), importance scores ≥ 4.35 (5-point scale), and low variation coefficients (≤ 0.12), indicating strong consensus. Conclusion: This study developed a theory-driven, content-validated dyadic psychoeducational intervention for MHD patient-caregiver dyads. Future multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to validate long-term efficacy. Keywords: Delphi method, double ABC-X model, dyadic psychoeducational intervention, maintenance hemodialysis, program development
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liyuan Zhang
XiaoHong Zhang
W.H. Wilson Tang
Patient Preference and Adherence
Nantong University
Taizhou People's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2abce4eeef8a2a6afc27 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s598462
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: