The expansion of fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks has increased environmental exposure to mid-band and millimeter-wave radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF), but their molecular effects on male reproductive tissues remain insufficiently understood. This study evaluated whether repeated exposure to 3.5 GHz and 24 GHz RF-EMF alters testicular stress-associated molecular responses by integrating electromagnetic dosimetry with an in vivo rat model. Whole-body specific absorption rate (SAR) and 10 g peak SAR were estimated using a rat voxel model and scaled to the 20 cm antenna-to-cage geometry used during exposure. Thirty-six adult male Sprague Dawley rats were allocated to sham, 3.5 GHz, or 24 GHz groups and exposed for 1 h/day or 7 h/day over 60 days. Testes were examined histologically and assessed for HSP27, HSP70, and HSP90 protein expression. SAR values were low overall, although absorption was higher at 3.5 GHz than at 24 GHz. Histological evaluation showed preserved seminiferous tubule architecture without consistent structural injury. In contrast, molecular analysis demonstrated frequency- and duration-dependent modulation of heat shock proteins, including early HSP70 downregulation at both frequencies, followed by HSP90 upregulation at 3.5 GHz and HSP27 upregulation at 24 GHz. These findings indicate that low-level 5G-relevant RF-EMF exposure can modify molecular stress responses in testicular tissue even in the absence of overt histological damage.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Syed Muhamad Asyraf Syed Taha
Farah Hanan Fathihah Jaffar
Atikah Hairulazam
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
National University of Malaysia
University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Technical University of Malaysia Malacca
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Taha et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2ae6e4eeef8a2a6afe20 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27083452
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: