Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In contemporary digital ecosystems, artificial intelligence (AI) and social media technologies increasingly structure how individuals access, process, and prioritize information. While AI-driven personalization enhances efficiency and engagement, it also reshapes cognitive environments in ways that introduce subtle yet consequential vulnerabilities. Existing information security frameworks remain predominantly system-centered, emphasizing data protection, infrastructure integrity, and network defense. However, these approaches insufficiently address risks targeting human cognition itself. This study introduces cognitive security as a foundational dimension of information security, defined as the protection of attention, reasoning, memory, and decision-making autonomy from manipulation, overload, bias reinforcement, and covert algorithmic influence. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship from artificial intelligence, cognitive science, digital governance, and human security studies, the paper develops a conceptual synthesis linking AI mechanisms to cognitive vulnerabilities and broader human security implications. The analysis demonstrates how AI-driven personalization and algorithmic curation foster cognitive offloading, attention fragmentation, metacognitive distortion, and increased susceptibility to misinformation and privacy asymmetries. To address these risks, the paper proposes a multi-layered human-centered information security framework integrating technical safeguards, regulatory oversight, ethical design principles, and educational interventions. By foregrounding cognitive integrity as a strategic asset, this study advances a reframing of information security that situates the protection of human capital at the core of digital governance.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anutsetsen Enkhzorigt
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anutsetsen Enkhzorigt (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b17a487c87a6a40d265 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20186334
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: