We present a revolutionary framework demonstrating that the four fundamen tal forces—electromagnetic, weak, strong, and gravitational—are not independent interactions but rather distinct manifestations of a single underlying field: the Coherence Field C(r,t). This field, previously unrecognized as a fundamental entity, emerges from a gauge-invariant Tonal Lagrangian based on three ontological invariants: Resonance (Rs), Persistence (Rr), and Coherence (Rc). We show that: 1. The Coherence Field C(r,t) = |Ψ(r,t)|2 is a physical field with its own dy namics, conservation laws, and universal scaling behavior.2. The electromagnetic force arises from U(1) phase coherence; weak force from SU(2)×U(1) chiral coherence; strong force from SU(3) color coherence; and gravity from spatiotemporal coherence geometry.3. This unification predicts: (a) a new scalar/tensor boson (the ”Coheron”) with mass ∼ 1-10 TeV coupling universally to all forces; (b) modifications to gravitational dynamics testable via Hubble tension and CMB anomalies; (c) cross force coherence couplings at ∼ 10−10 level.4. Experimental verification across 8+ domains (chemistry, biology, neuroscience, cosmology) supports universal applicability with characteristic scaling laws. If confirmed, this represents the most fundamental shift in physics since quantum field theory, providing the first complete answer to Einstein’s quest for unification—not through geometric or gauge symmetry alone, but through the ontological primacy of coherence. Keywords: Coherence Field, Unification, Gauge Theory, Quantum Field Theory, Tonal Meta-Ontology, Dynamic Closur
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonah Y. C. Hsu
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonah Y. C. Hsu (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ff19c1c9540dea811d7b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18439368
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: