Abstract Background: CLEOPATRA trial, adding Pertuzumab to Docetaxel and Trastuzumab improved median overall survival (OS) from 40.8 to 57.1 months and remains guideline-defining for first-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), albeit with risks of myelosuppression and long-term neurotoxicity. In HR+ HER2+ MBC, few studies presented good outcomes with addition of endocrine therapy (ET) and CDK4/6 inhibitors without chemotherapy (PERTAIN, SYSUCC-002, PERNETTA, BR 18-2 MINI). Robust real-world survival data comparing chemotherapy-free versus taxane-induction strategies in this subgroup are lacking. Methods: TriNetX Global Collaborative Network (152 sites, 2008-2024) was queried for adults (≥18 y) with incident HR+ HER2+ MBC treated with Trastuzumab (± Pertuzumab) plus ET. Patients receiving ≥1 dose of paclitaxel or docetaxel within 6 months of diagnosis before the first HER2-targeted dose constituted the induction cohort (IND, n = 365 pre-match); others served as controls (CTRL, n = 498). One-to-one propensity-score matching (caliper 0.10) on 13 demographics/comorbidities yielded 323 well-balanced pairs (N = 646); after matching all standardized differences were 0.10 except male sex (3 % vs 0 %). Ten-year OS was the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes were grade-coded neutropenia, sepsis, heart failure, emergency-department (ED) visits and intensive-care-unit (ICU) admission. Survival analysis done with univariate Kaplan Meier and Cox models. Results: Of 7184 HR+ HER2+ MBC cases, 2114 received first-line Trastuzumab (± Pertuzumab) + ET; 863 met prespecified criteria (365 IND, 498 CTRL); 646 remained after 1:1 matching. Matched cohorts were well balanced, with median age 52 years, 96 % female, 59 % White, 22 % Black. All baseline standardized differences 0.10 (except male sex 3 % vs 0 %). Median follow-up was 1578 vs 1151 days (IND vs CTRL). Ten-year OS was 64.3 % in IND vs 53.1 % in CTRL (absolute gain 11.2 %; HR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.47-0.85, P = 0.002). Ten-year mortality fell from 31.9 % to 24.1 % (absolute risk reduction 7.8 %; NNT = 13). Survival curves diverged by 12 months and remained parallel. Induction increased neutropenia (25.7 % vs 13.9 %; HR 1.88, P 0.001) and ED visits (63.5 % vs 51.7 %; HR 1.24, P = 0.009); with median time to first ED visit shortened from 1084 to 678 days in the IND group. Serious events were comparable: sepsis 17.6 % vs 14.9 % (P = 0.34), heart failure 18.0 % vs 16.4 % (P = 0.60), ICU admission 16.1 % vs 16.4 % (P = 0.92). Conclusions: In contrast to some signals from chemotherapy-free regimens in PERTAIN, SYSUCC-002 and PERNETTA, this real-world study shows that a short taxane induction in HR+ HER2+ MBC before trastuzumab-ET confers a 36 % relative and 11 % absolute 10-year OS advantage; one extra life saved per thirteen treated; at the cost of predictable, manageable myelosuppression and higher acute-care use without excess cardiotoxicity, sepsis or ICU need. This data strengthens guideline endorsements of chemotherapy-containing first-line regimens and asks for careful discussion if upfront de-escalation is considered, as well as provides a benchmark for ongoing chemo-sparing strategies utilized in other trials (DESTINY-Breast09, DEMETHER, etc.). Selection and lead-time bias are possible but were mitigated by robust propensity matching. Citation Format: M. Eysha, M. Elchouemi, W. Zhang, R. del Toro-Mijares, A. Asad, A. Elkhanany. Taxane induction before trastuzumab-endocrine therapy improves 10-year survival in ER-positive HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a propensity-matched real-world analysis of 646 patients abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-01-20.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mostafa Eysha
Mohanad Elchouemi
W. Zhang
Clinical Cancer Research
Baylor College of Medicine
Duke Medical Center
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eysha et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a957ecb39a600b3f045f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-01-20
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: