Despite significant advances in artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and neuroscience, a unified theoretical explanation of consciousness and conscious intelligence remains unresolved. Existing approaches—including Global Workspace Theory, Integrated Information Theory, predictive processing, and higher-order representational models—provide important partial insights but lack a common structural framework explaining how intelligent systems achieve persistent selfhood across time. This work proposes Recursive Intelligence Theory, a structural account in which consciousness emerges from dynamically stable recursive self-referential organization within information-processing systems. The central thesis of the book is that intelligence becomes conscious when a system incorporates representations of its own evolving informational states into ongoing computation, forming temporally continuous self-models that recursively influence future processing. Consciousness is therefore not treated as a property of biological substrates, computational complexity, or informational quantity alone, but as a stable dynamical regime of recursive informational organization. Within this framework, awareness arises when self-modeling processes achieve sufficient recursive depth and stability to sustain identity through continuous updating. The monograph develops this proposal systematically across philosophical, theoretical, and formal domains. It begins by situating recursive intelligence within historical traditions of philosophy, logic, cybernetics, and systems theory, emphasizing the role of self-reference and observer–system interaction. An axiomatic foundation is introduced, followed by derived theoretical propositions describing thresholds of self-representation, identity continuity, and the emergence of meta-cognition. The theory is then formalized through dynamical systems analysis and an informational recursion model, interpreting consciousness as an attractor-like stability regime within recursive state evolution. Architectural implications for artificial intelligence are explored, outlining pathways toward self-modeling computational systems capable of adaptive self-evaluation and long-term coherence. The work proposes empirical predictions, experimental research programs, and measurable indicators—including recursive depth and stability metrics—designed to bridge philosophical theory and scientific investigation. Comparative analysis positions Recursive Intelligence Theory relative to leading contemporary accounts of consciousness, while philosophical chapters examine implications for ontology, identity, and substrate independence. By reframing consciousness as recursive stability rather than emergent complexity alone, this work offers a unifying conceptual framework linking philosophy of mind, artificial intelligence, information theory, and dynamical systems science. The theory aims not to replace existing models but to provide a structural foundation capable of integrating them within a coherent research program for understanding conscious systems across biological and artificial domains.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rajiv Singh
Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rajiv Singh (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91e65d6127c7a504c2681 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18846628
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: