Abstract This article examines Plutarch’s reading of Plato’s Timaeus 47e3–48a7, arguing that Plutarch interprets the passage as referring to three principles rather than two, distinguishing necessity from the wandering cause as two separate principles. The article explores the exegetical and philosophical motivations behind Plutarch’s interpretation, highlighting its originality in contrast to both earlier Platonist readings and modern scholarly interpretations.
Arianna Piazzalunga (Tue,) studied this question.