Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Interpretation of Bedside Chest Radiographs

Background Supine chest radiography for bedridden patients in intensive care units (ICUs) is one of the most frequently ordered imaging studies worldwide. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a neural network-based model that is trained on structured semiquantitative radiologic reports of bedside chest radiographs. Materials and Methods For this retrospective single-center study, children and adults in the ICU of a university hospital who had been imaged using bedside chest radiography from January 2009 to December 2020 were reported by using a structured and itemized template. Ninety-eight radiologists rated the radiographs semiquantitatively for the severity of disease patterns. These data were used to train a neural network to identify cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion, pleural effusion, pulmonary opacities, and atelectasis. A held-out internal test set (100 radiographs from 100 patients) that was assessed independently by an expert panel of six radiologists provided the ground truth. Individual assessments by each of these six radiologists, by two nonradiologist physicians in the ICU, and by the neural network were compared with the ground truth. Separately, the nonradiologist physicians assessed the images without and with preliminary readings provided by the neural network. The weighted Cohen κ coefficient was used to measure agreement between the readers and the ground truth. Results A total of 193 566 radiographs in 45 016 patients (mean age, 66 years ± 16 SD; 61% men) were included and divided into training (n = 122 294; 64%), validation (n = 31 243; 16%), and test (n = 40 029; 20%) sets. The neural network exhibited higher agreement with a majority vote of the expert panel (κ = 0.86) than each individual radiologist compared with the majority vote of the expert panel (κ = 0.81 to ≤0.84). When the neural network provided preliminary readings, the reports of the nonradiologist physicians improved considerably (aided vs unaided, κ = 0.87 vs 0.79, respectively; P Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Wielpütz in this issue.