ABSTRACT This article explores how accounting ideas travel to unfamiliar environments and instigate new modes of calculation therein. The empirical focus is on the food balance sheet, a key calculative technology in the realm of food security. Drawing on Said's four‐stage schema for analyzing the movement of theories and ideas, this investigation traces the journeying of the balance sheet to the field of food security from the First World War, culminating in the institutionalization of the food balance sheet as a standardized and universal practice from the late 1940s. The study reveals the conditions that facilitated acceptance of the balance sheet idea in a new field—specifically, its alignment to the problem of managing the national and global supply of food, as well as the presence of individual actants who recognized its utility for communicating and addressing the problem of food insecurity during periods of global conflict and humanitarian crisis. These key individuals emanated from the United States, the dominant power in an age of internationalism. It is shown that conceptual traveling involved the jettisoning of core elements of the accounting construction of the balance sheet, but also their selective reimportation once the balance sheet became domesticated in its new location. The article offers original insights to the forces that generate calculative innovations in epistemic communities beyond accounting.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Walker et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b2ce4eeef8a2a6b019e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.70043
Stephen P. Walker
Massimo Sargiacomo
Contemporary Accounting Research
University of Edinburgh
University of Chieti-Pescara
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...