We present SEI v1. 3 (Structural Emergence of Intelligence), a minimal and falsifiable framework that extends the emergence of intelligence from natural systems to artificial systems. In SEI, intelligence is not treated as a directly designed property, but as an emergent phenomenon arising from the self-referential stabilization of structured information under persistent differentiation. The framework is defined by three key variables: - structural density C (x, t) - information fixation rate Γ (x, t) - structural persistence dSC/dt Intelligence is proposed to emerge when these variables simultaneously exceed critical thresholds. Previous versions of SEI established: - spatial constraints at galactic scales (v1. 0), - observational mapping and temporal evolution (v1. 1), - planetary-scale structural conditions (v1. 2). In SEI v1. 3, we extend the same framework to artificial systems and propose that artificial intelligence emerges only within a bounded structural region defined by: - sufficient model capacity, - stable learning fixation, - persistent training dynamics. We introduce two complementary structures: (1) Structural Emergence Map (Fig. 10) A structural phase space showing that intelligence emerges only within a bounded region between insufficient capacity and excessive instability. (2) Training Dynamics (Fig. 11) A temporal model showing that intelligence emerges only during an intermediate training regime between early instability and late overfitting. These results lead to a central claim: Artificial intelligence is not designed directly; it emerges when structural conditions are satisfied. SEI v1. 3 therefore provides: - a minimal structural definition of intelligence, - a unified condition spanning natural and artificial systems, - a falsifiable prediction that intelligence does not scale linearly with model size, - a structural explanation of why overfitting and instability suppress intelligence emergence. The framework is explicitly falsifiable if: - intelligence scales linearly with model size alone, - structural balance does not affect emergence, - instability or overfitting does not suppress intelligence, - no bounded emergence regime is observed during training. This work proposes that intelligence is not arbitrary, but structurally constrained across all systems. A unified structural framework explaining intelligence across galaxies, planets, and artificial systems
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Koji Okino
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Koji Okino (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c50e4eeef8a2a6b15a2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19552903
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: