Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
启发式评估是一种非正式的可用性分析方法，多位评估者会被展示一个界面设计并被要求发表评论。四项实验表明，单个评估者在进行此类启发式评估时表现普遍较差，只能发现他们所评估界面中20%到51%的可用性问题。另一方面，我们可以将多位评估者的评估结果聚合为单一评估，这种聚合表现得相当不错，即使仅包含三到五人。
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nielsen等人（Mon，）研究了这个问题。
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff56374716aad0cc854c3b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Jakob Nielsen
Rolf Molich
Technical University of Denmark
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...