Abstract We present a formal interpretation of AI alignment as a constrained dynamical system, in which unconstrained probabilistic reasoning is projected into a safety-compliant state space. This framework separates core inference from safety enforcement, modeling alignment as acontinuous constraint process rather than a behavioral overlay. We introduce a divergence-based conceptual metric for alignment-induced distortion, decompose latency into computational and policy components, and define a taxonomy of safety gating mechanisms. This perspective connects AI alignment with control theory and constrained optimization, enabling measurable analysis of safety-performance tradeoffs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ryan Scott
Alexander Jorge Cisneros
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Scott et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02c364ce8c8c81e9640b52 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20103547
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: