PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 5, 20250 citations

Becoming Present: The Collapse of Possibility into Time

View Full Paper
TTTenzin C. Trepp

Key Points

  • MAIN FINDING: Existential realism offers a framework that prioritizes the present while acknowledging past causes and future possibilities.
  • KEY EVIDENCE: Quantum experiments indicate that reality is determined in the present, supporting an ontology that includes temporal agency.
  • APPROACH: The work builds on earlier critiques of presentism, exploring the implications for understanding quantum mechanics and reality.
  • SIGNIFICANCE: This perspective enhances our understanding of reality by providing a richer ontology for engaging with time and existence.

Abstract

Modern physics has increasingly highlighted the special role of the present moment in the unfolding of reality. Quantum experiments suggest that reality is not a static four-dimensional block but is actively determined in the present moment, as measurements seem to bring about definite outcomes only at the instant they are performed. This resonates with presentist intuitions (the view that only the present exists), yet strict presentism faces serious metaphysical problems. How can only the present be real, if past causes clearly leave effects and future events are anticipated? This paper advocates Existential Realism (ER) as a superior ontological framework that preserves the primacy of the present while accounting for the reality of past causes and future possibilities. Building on our earlier introduction of ER and critique of presentism’s limits, we will show that ER provides a richer ontology for quantum phenomena – one that distinguishes between existence and reality, and accommodates genuine becoming and temporal agency in ways that purely present-based theories cannot. We make bold but rigorous claims: that quantum mechanics “prefers” a present-centered ontology, and that Existential Realism best captures this without the pitfalls of naive presentism or the stagnancy of eternalism. In short, ER not only aligns with quantum physics – it elevates and refines the very notion of what it means for something to be real in time.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tenzin C. Trepp (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0f93e6551bb0af8d10d1https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y3shq_v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1WITHDRAWN2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2WITHDRAWN2025 · 5 citations
  3. 3Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?1935 · 16,831 citations
  4. 4Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky1957 · 715 citations
  5. 5Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories1969 · 7,691 citations