PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 6, 2025JCO Oncology Practice3 citations

Management of Anemia in Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms With Novel Agents

View Full Paper
FHFieke W. HoffSCStephen S. ChungAZAmer M. Zeidan

Key Points

  • Novel agents like imetelstat show promise for treating anemia in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
  • Clinical trial results indicate that imetelstat achieved rbc transfusion independence in 40% of patients.
  • RBC transfusion dependence is a common issue that can negatively impact quality of life for patients.
  • Future research is needed to explore combinations of therapies to enhance treatment effectiveness in mds.

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of diseases that are prognostically stratified into lower-risk (LR-MDS) and higher-risk MDS on the basis of the International Prognostic Scoring System (eg, IPSS, revised IPSS, and molecular IPSS). Anemia is a hallmark of MDS and can lead to worsening of preexisting comorbidities, long-term RBC transfusion dependence, and profound fatigue. Although RBC transfusion support provides rapid relief of anemia-associated symptoms, it also carries a risk of iron overload and alloimmunization, and is associated with a decreased quality of life. Thus, many clinical trials and treatment strategies for LR-MDS focus on RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) as a primary end point. In this review, we discuss the updated treatment paradigm for anemia in LR-MDS. Novel insights in the pathogenesis of MDS and results from positive phase III clinical trials in LR-MDS have led to a growing number of therapeutic options (eg, luspatercept and imetelstat). Imetelstat was recently added as a new agent for patients who are refractory/resistant or ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment on the basis of the randomized phase III IMerge trial, showing that imetelstat led to the primary end point of RBC-TI for ≥8 weeks in 40% of patients compared with 15% in patients receiving placebo. However, future clinical trials are needed to investigate the optimal sequencing of different agents and the potential of improving efficacy using combination of therapeutic strategies in LR-MDS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoff et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0f99e6551bb0af8d1530https://doi.org/10.1200/op-24-00910
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper