PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Frontiers in Nutrition5 citationsOpen Access

The association between fluid balance trajectories and prognosis in ICU patients with cardiac arrest, a group-based trajectory model analysis

View Full Paper
QZQitian ZhangGLGuangyu LinCZChunmei Zhang

Key Points

  • Survival rates were significantly higher in patients with a rapid transition to negative fluid balance.
  • Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated a stark contrast in survival between fluid overload and non-overload groups.
  • The Group-Based Trajectory Model effectively identified distinct fluid balance patterns among ICU patients.
  • Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of findings across different patient subgroups.

Abstract

Background The impact of dynamic fluid balance (FB) changes on the prognosis of ICU patients with cardiac arrest (CA) remains unclear. This study aims to explore the association between FB trajectories and the prognosis of such patients. Methods Data were sourced from CA patients in the MIMIC-IV database. A Group-Based Trajectory Model (GBTM) was used to identify patient subgroups with similar FB trajectories. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox regression models were applied to analyze the association between FB trajectories and survival outcomes in CA patients. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to further validate the robustness of the results. Results A total of 876 CA patients were included. Four distinct FB trajectory patterns were identified, Trajectory 1 (rapid transition to negative balance), Trajectory 2 (stable balance), Trajectory 3 (positive balance gradually decreasing), and Trajectory 4 (decreasing at a high level). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the survival rate in Trajectory 1 was significantly higher than in the other trajectory groups, with the fluid overload group exhibiting a notably higher mortality risk than the non-overload group. Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that, after adjusting for various covariates, the survival rate in Trajectory 1 remained significantly higher than in other trajectory groups (Reference, Trajectory 1; Trajectory 2, HR = 1.75 1.31–2.34, Trajectory 3, HR = 2.02 1.53, 2.68, Trajectory 4, HR = 1.71 1.24, 2.37). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not alter these findings. Conclusion The GBTM method helps to identify subgroups of ICU cardiac arrest patients with distinct risk profiles. Among the dynamic FB types, the group with rapid transition to negative balance at a moderate level (Trajectory 1) showed the best prognosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb49db6d6d5674bcd00212https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1664640
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper