PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025New Zealand Veterinary Journal1 citationsOpen Access

Using post-mortem computed tomography to identify traumatic cranial lesions in small stranded odontocetes euthanised via ballistics

View Full Paper
RBRebecca M. BoysRSRamari Oliphant StewartBKBrian C. W. Kot

Key Points

  • Post-mortem computed tomography revealed varied cranial trauma and insensibility levels in cetaceans euthanised by ballistics.
  • Of the six examined cetaceans, two were likely instantly insensible, while others had varying chances of insensibility.
  • The effectiveness of ballistics euthanasia was influenced by shot placement, projectile characteristics, and cranial anatomy.
  • Verification of insensibility after euthanasia is critical to ensure humane treatment of cetaceans in distress.

Abstract

To describe the pathophysiology caused by ballistics applied to the head of stranded cetaceans that required euthanasia and use this information to infer the likely welfare implications of these real-life euthanasia events. Post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) imaging was conducted on six cetacean carcasses of five different species that were submitted for dissection following ballistics euthanasia. No animals were euthanised for the purpose of this study. All data were collected opportunistically at stranding events where euthanasia was a priori deemed necessary by the Department of Conservation (DOC) in partnership with indigenous Māori (iwi). The cranial damage assessed included osseous lesions at entry and exit wounds, intracranial bone fractures and intracranial projectile fragments. Potential welfare implications were inferred based on the likelihood of instantaneous insensibility occurring due to direct physical disruption to the brainstem. Additionally, basic stranding data were collected from DOC incident reports including whether animals were refloated prior to the decision for euthanasia. We also gathered information from the marksperson involved on how the ballistics method was employed, equipment used, and animal insensibility assessed at each stranding event. PMCT results suggest that two animals were likely instantaneously insensible, three had a moderate chance of being instantly insensible and one had a low chance of instantaneous insensibility. In one case, the marksperson reported a faster time to insensibility/death than was judged likely to have occurred from PMCT. In only two cases were the criteria for verifying insensibility reported as being checked. The likelihood of instantaneous insensibility occurring was affected by shot placement/aim and characteristics of the projectile used. Euthanasia is a critical option for severely compromised cetaceans. While most animals examined were probably rapidly insensible following shooting, cranial trauma and thus confidence in the efficacy of ballistics seemed to vary with shot placement, aim, equipment and cranial anatomy. Verification of insensibility immediately following shooting, by assessing reflex responses as recommended, is crucial to ensure humane emergency management. PMCT provides an effective non-destructive tool to validate field methods for assessing the efficacy of euthanasia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Boys et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a3f954b1d3bfb60de240https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2025.2536859
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper