PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 17, 2024Scientific Reports14 citationsOpen Access

Variable-stiffness prosthesis improves biomechanics of walking across speeds compared to a passive device

View Full Paper
EREmily RogersSYSeong Ho YeonCLChristian Landis

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Ankle push-off power plays an important role in healthy walking, contributing to center-of-mass acceleration, swing leg dynamics, and accounting for 45% of total leg power. The majority of existing passive energy storage and return prostheses for people with below-knee (transtibial) amputation are stiffer than the biological ankle, particularly at slower walking speeds. Additionally, passive devices provide insufficient levels of energy return and push-off power, negatively impacting biomechanics of gait. Here, we present a clinical study evaluating the kinematics and kinetics of walking with a microprocessor-controlled, variable-stiffness ankle-foot prosthesis (945 g) compared to a standard low-mass passive prosthesis (Ottobock Taleo, 463 g) with 7 study participants having unilateral transtibial amputation. By modulating prosthesis stiffness under computer control across walking speeds, we demonstrate that there exists a stiffness that increases prosthetic-side energy return, peak power, and center-of-mass push-off work, and decreases contralateral limb peak ground reaction force compared to the standard passive prosthesis across all evaluated walking speeds. We demonstrate a significant increase in center-of-mass push-off work of 26.1%, 26.2%, 29.6% and 29.9% at 0.75 m/s, 1.0 m/s, 1.25 m/s, and 1.5 m/s, respectively, and a significant decrease in contralateral limb ground reaction force of 3.1%, 3.9%, and 3.2% at 1.0 m/s, 1.25 m/s, and 1.5 m/s, respectively. This study demonstrates the potential for a quasi-passive microprocessor-controlled variable-stiffness prosthesis to increase push-off power and energy return during gait at a range of walking speeds compared to a passive device of a fixed stiffness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rogers et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5fefbb6db64358759305chttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67230-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement2007 · 5,062 citations
  2. 2A review on structural analysis and experimental investigation of fiber reinforced composite leaf spring2014 · 34 citations
  3. 3Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces1998 · 595 citations
  4. 4Selecting the number of trials in experimental biomechanics studies2015 · 52 citations
  5. 5The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees2011 · 192 citations