PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2024PROTEOMICS2 citationsOpen Access

Filling the gaps in peptide maps with a platform assay for top‐down characterization of purified protein samples

View Full Paper
ABAaron O. BaileyKDKenneth R. DurbinMRMatthew T. Robey

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) intact mass analysis and LC‐MS/MS peptide mapping are decisional assays for developing biological drugs and other commercial protein products. Certain PTM types, such as truncation and oxidation, increase the difficulty of precise proteoform characterization owing to inherent limitations in peptide and intact protein analyses. Top‐down MS (TDMS) can resolve this ambiguity via fragmentation of specific proteoforms. We leveraged the strengths of flow‐programmed (fp) denaturing online buffer exchange (dOBE) chromatography, including robust automation, relatively high ESI sensitivity, and long MS/MS window time, to support a TDMS platform for industrial protein characterization. We tested data‐dependent (DDA) and targeted strategies using 14 different MS/MS scan types featuring combinations of collisional‐ and electron‐based fragmentation as well as proton transfer charge reduction. This large, focused dataset was processed using a new software platform, named TDAcquireX, that improves proteoform characterization through TDMS data aggregation. A DDA‐based workflow provided objective identification of αLac truncation proteoforms with a two‐termini clipping search. A targeted TDMS workflow facilitated the characterization of αLac oxidation positional isomers. This strategy relied on using sliding window‐based fragment ion deconvolution to generate composite proteoform spectral match (cPrSM) results amenable to fragment noise filtering, which is a fundamental enhancement relevant to TDMS applications generally.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bailey et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60658b6db64358759987fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202400036
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper