PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 8, 20250 citationsOpen Access

BenchHub: A Unified Benchmark Suite for Holistic and Customizable LLM Evaluation

View Full Paper
EKEun‐Su KimHYHaneul YooGSGuijin Son

Key Points

  • Model performance significantly varies across domain-specific subsets, highlighting the need for customizable evaluations.
  • BenchHub integrates 303K questions across 38 benchmarks, providing a structured repository for large language models.
  • This dynamic benchmark repository supports continuous updates, facilitating scalable and flexible evaluations.
  • Encourages better dataset reuse and transparent model comparisons, vital for advancing large language model evaluation.

Abstract

As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, the need for up-to-date and well-organized benchmarks becomes increasingly critical. However, many existing datasets are scattered, difficult to manage, and make it challenging to perform evaluations tailored to specific needs or domains, despite the growing importance of domain-specific models in areas such as math or code. In this paper, we introduce BenchHub, a dynamic benchmark repository that empowers researchers and developers to evaluate LLMs more effectively. BenchHub aggregates and automatically classifies benchmark datasets from diverse domains, integrating 303K questions across 38 benchmarks. It is designed to support continuous updates and scalable data management, enabling flexible and customizable evaluation tailored to various domains or use cases. Through extensive experiments with various LLM families, we demonstrate that model performance varies significantly across domain-specific subsets, emphasizing the importance of domain-aware benchmarking. We believe BenchHub can encourage better dataset reuse, more transparent model comparisons, and easier identification of underrepresented areas in existing benchmarks, offering a critical infrastructure for advancing LLM evaluation research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6d7971ffa7aa7d63d177ahttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2506.00482
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Beyond Benchmarking: A New Paradigm for Evaluation and Assessment of Large Language Models2024
  3. 3Large Language Model Benchmarks: A Taxonomy of Capabilities, Scientific Quality Assessment, and Saturation Analysis2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examples2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5AI Benchmark Half-Life in Recursive Corpora: A Theory of Validity Decay under Semantic Leakage and Regeneration2024 · 20 citations