PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Christianity & Literature0 citations

Who Is The Author?

View Full Paper
KŠKrešimir Šimić

Key Points

  • To investigate the notion of authorship across different literary cultures and historical periods, especially the transition in literary thought from classical to postmodern times.
  • Examines classical Greek and medieval exegetical literary cultures
  • Analyzes theories of authorship by Barthes and Foucault
  • Explores the ontological perspectives of Cappadocian thinkers like Basil the Great
  • Discusses the implications of these theories on the nature of authorship and individualism
  • Argues that the author is a person embodying personal character and not just a construct of language
  • Suggests that literary works reflect the specific author's individuality rather than being mere intertextual compilations
  • Highlights the importance of the ontological perspective in understanding the essence of authorship through historical contexts.

Abstract

Abstract: This article begins by examining the issue of authorship in classical Greek and medieval exegetical literary cultures and then proceeds to explore the tendencies that point to the ‘disappearance’ of the author in nineteenth-century literary studies. It continues by focusing on Barthes’s and Foucault’s theories of authorship, which inspired a seminal postmodern belief: that the subject (author) is a fictional emanation of language and writing, which subvert all attempts by the human agent to be the source of action. Then relying on John Zizioulas and Christos Yannaras, the article highlights the ontological interpretation of the person given by the so-called Cappadocians: Basil the Great, Gregory of Nazianzus, and Gregory of Nyssa. Based on the ontological understanding of the person as freedom, this article concludes by proving its hypothesis that the author is, in fact, a person and a hypostatic-ecstatic being as well as that a literary work is a reflection of personal character, not a mere tissue of quotations or intertext. On the contrary, it is always the work of a specific author.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krešimir Šimić (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827f00fc35cd7a8846fbahttps://doi.org/10.1353/chy.2025.a982265
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper